New: WildDash 2 with 4256 public frames, new labels & panoptic GT!
See also: RailSem19 dataset for rail scene understanding.
For all metrics, higher scores are better. To participate in the benchmark, check our submission instructions.
Meta AVG | Classic | Negative | Impact (AP) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithm | AP | AP | AP 50% | AP | Blur | Coverage | Distortion | Hood | Occ. | Overexp. | Particles | Screen | Underexp. | Var. |
UniDet_RVC | 21.0% | 23.1% | 35.7% | 12.3% | -36% | -13% | 0% | -17% | -13% | -41% | -22% | -25% | -24% | -44% |
seamseg_rvcsubset | 20.9% | 22.7% | 37.6% | 12.4% | -17% | -37% | -5% | -15% | -15% | -4% | -32% | -63% | -26% | -17% |
seamseg_mvd_is | 20.6% | 23.7% | 38.9% | 9.5% | -9% | -30% | -8% | -23% | -12% | 0% | -55% | -61% | -13% | -2% |
Methodology:
Our benchmark evaluates the negative Impact of common visual hazards on algorithm output performance. It is calculated by this formula:
impact = min(metriclow,metrichigh) / max(metricnone,metriclow) - 1.0
The metricsnone/low/high are evaluated on subsets of the benchmark dataset that correspond to the identified severity of the hazard (e.g. the subset Blurhigh contains images which have a lot of blur visible). Positive impacts are truncated to zero.
An impact of -10% at Blur translates to an expected performance degradation for the algorithm of 10 percent when there is a considerable blur in the input image as opposed to supplying the same algorithm a similar image without noticeable image blur.
These are all currently evaluated hazards:
Blur: Image is noticeably affected by blur (e.g. motion blur, defocusing, compression artifacts...)
Coverage: Normally visible parts of the road are covered (e.g. unusual lane markings, snow, leaves...)
Distortion: Visible lens distortion
Hood: Ego-vehicle is visible, non-windscreen parts (e.g. car hood, mirrors)
Occl: Objects are partially occluded or cut off by image border
Overexp.: The scene is overexposed
Particle: Particles in the air obstruct the view (e.g. heavy rain, snow, fog)
Screen: The windscreen is interfering (e.g. interior reflections, wipers, rain on the windscreen,...)
Underexp.: The image is underexposed
Variation: Intra-class variations within the image (i.e. unusual representations of labels like unique cars)
More details on evaluation metrics and negative test cases can also be found on the FAQ page.